ASML « Terug naar discussie overzicht

ASML in 2015

2.899 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 » | Laatste
1ofakind
0
Op de dip in augustus op 73.93 wat ASML-etjes gekocht. Doel is 95 euri, begint steeds dichterbij te komen... Dan maar weer gaan verkopen denk ik, anders krijg ik hoogtevrees...
[verwijderd]
0
Maandag rond de 90 euro maar wat winst pakken. AEX >473 en Lithootjes >90 dan wacht ik nog ff af...;-)
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

1ofakind schreef op 6 november 2015 19:45:

Op de dip in augustus op 73.93 wat ASML-etjes gekocht. Doel is 95 euri, begint steeds dichterbij te komen... Dan maar weer gaan verkopen denk ik, anders krijg ik hoogtevrees...
Dus jij bent degene die tegen de allerlaagste koers van dit jaar aandelen heeft aangekocht. Ik vroeg me al af wie dat was.
Anneleen
0
Jazeker, die E100 voor ASML gaan we binnenkort zeker zien.
Mijn koersdoel blijft E120 voor dit jaar
Er wordt al flink gehedged op ASML met als resultaat een rappe tegenovergestelde, positieve koersbeweging tov afgelopen tijd!
Anneleen
0
ASML beleggers mochten afgelopen week 5%
en afgelopen maand 13% bijschrijven!
Maar velen konden blijkbaar de afgelopen maanden de stress van de downtrend niet aan en zijn jammergenoeg te vroeg uitgestapt
Nog steeds een aantrekkelijke koers om in te stappen
Op naar de E120!
Nice guy
0
quote:

Prince Meander schreef op 9 november 2015 11:40:

ASML beleggers mochten afgelopen week 5%
en afgelopen maand 13% bijschrijven!
Maar velen konden blijkbaar de afgelopen maanden de stress van de downtrend niet aan en zijn jammergenoeg te vroeg uitgestapt
Nog steeds een aantrekkelijke koers om in te stappen
Op naar de E120!
Goede resultaten en toch een gekelderde koers, Aandelen ASML waren afgelopen tijd in de aanbieding.
Als je je aandelen dan hebt verkocht begrijp je niets van beleggen.
Anneleen
0
En toen stond er alweer E90,24 op de borden; deze week nog naar E95 en voor eind 2015 E120
altijdwat
0
@Prince Meander : als jij inderdaad iets meldt over de koers gaat die prompt zakken (LOL)...
[verwijderd]
0
The stock is testing st-support at ~87.50 for a second session...., and profs are buying st-'puts'....

Take care.

Just not bad to know:

What’s ASML Holding NV (ADR) Upside After Today’s Bearish Options Activity?


November 10, 2015 by Casey Mccarthy in Stock Options News (financialmagazin.com)

"In today’s session ASML Holding NV (ADR) (ASML) recorded an unusually high (601) contracts volume of put trades. Someone, most probably a professional was a very active buyer of the November, 2015 put, expecting serious ASML decrease. With 601 contracts traded and 1206 open interest for the Nov, 15 contract, it seems this is a quite bearish bet. The option with symbol: ASML151120P00097500 closed last at: $4.6 or 48.4% up. The stock is down 0.02% or $0.02 after the news, hitting $93.5 per share. About 2.31 million shares traded hands or 128.71% up from the average. ASML Holding NV (ADR) (NASDAQ:ASML) has declined 4.25% since April 8, 2015 and is downtrending. It has underperformed by 4.09% the S&P500......"

·
nietsomber
0
To SNSN waarom niet het hele artikel knippen

komt dat niet uit me je verhaal?

Out of 4 analysts covering ASML Holding NV (NASDAQ:ASML), 2 rate it “Buy”, 1 “Sell”, while 1 “Hold”. This means 50% are positive. ASML Holding NV was the topic in 4 analyst reports since July 21, 2015 according to StockzIntelligence Inc.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SNSN schreef op 11 november 2015 10:33:

The stock is testing st-support at ~87.50 for a second session...., and profs are buying st-'puts'....

Take care.

Just not bad to know:

What’s ASML Holding NV (ADR) Upside After Today’s Bearish Options Activity?


November 10, 2015 by Casey Mccarthy in Stock Options News (financialmagazin.com)

"In today’s session ASML Holding NV (ADR) (ASML) recorded an unusually high (601) contracts volume of put trades. Someone, most probably a professional was a very active buyer of the November, 2015 put, expecting serious ASML decrease. With 601 contracts traded and 1206 open interest for the Nov, 15 contract, it seems this is a quite bearish bet. The option with symbol: ASML151120P00097500 closed last at: $4.6 or 48.4% up. The stock is down 0.02% or $0.02 after the news, hitting $93.5 per share. About 2.31 million shares traded hands or 128.71% up from the average. ASML Holding NV (ADR) (NASDAQ:ASML) has declined 4.25% since April 8, 2015 and is downtrending. It has underperformed by 4.09% the S&P500......"

·
Yeah, let's trade based on somebody else's could be's and would have's
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

nietsomber schreef op 11 november 2015 12:41:

To SNSN waarom niet het hele artikel knippen

komt dat niet uit me je verhaal?

Out of 4 analysts covering ASML Holding NV (NASDAQ:ASML), 2 rate it “Buy”, 1 “Sell”, while 1 “Hold”. This means 50% are positive. ASML Holding NV was the topic in 4 analyst reports since July 21, 2015 according to StockzIntelligence Inc.
Just because the first part represents an OBJECTIVE new fact/info, while the rest of the article:

1) is NOT really new (was repeated many times weeks ago), and

2) represents just SUBJECTIVE VIEWS of certain people (actually much more than 20 analysts are following the stock and have their own private opinions.... which are certainly NOT facts)

have a nice day/trading
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SNSN schreef op 11 november 2015 13:22:

[...]

Just because the first part represents an OBJECTIVE new fact/info, while the rest of the article:

1) is NOT really new (was repeated many times weeks ago), and

2) represents just SUBJECTIVE VIEWS of certain people (actually much more than 20 analysts are following the stock and have their own private opinions.... which are certainly NOT facts)

have a nice day/trading
Oh come on.. objective... :')

"it was probably" is not a strong indication of objectivity.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

MJansen schreef op 11 november 2015 13:34:

[...]

Oh come on.. objective... :')

"it was probably" is not a strong indication of objectivity.
Ja, indeed, just few objective new facts (not bad to know):

a) "... In today’s session ASML Holding NV (ADR) (ASML) recorded an unusually high (601) contracts volume of put trades..." (all traders know well what it means.... when 'puts' rise)

b) "... With 601 contracts traded and 1206 open interest for the Nov, 15 contract,..."

c) "... The option with symbol: ASML151120P00097500 closed last at: $4.6 or 48.4% up..." (all traders know well what it means when 'puts' prices rise sharply)

d) "... The stock is down 0.02% or $0.02 after the news, hitting $93.5 per share..."

e) "... About 2.31 million shares traded hands or 128.71% up from the average..." (all traders know what this means)

f) "... ASML Holding NV (ADR) (NASDAQ:ASML) has declined 4.25% since April 8, 2015 and is downtrending..." (yes, the last one is NOT really new - read old posts)


Actually it's clear (for many traders) without "author's subjective comments".... though, they may probably be useful for some people....
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SNSN schreef op 11 november 2015 14:11:

[...]

Ja, indeed, just few objective new facts (not bad to know):

a) "... In today’s session ASML Holding NV (ADR) (ASML) recorded an unusually high (601) contracts volume of put trades..."

b) "... With 601 contracts traded and 1206 open interest for the Nov, 15 contract,..."

c) "... The option with symbol: ASML151120P00097500 closed last at: $4.6 or 48.4% up..."

d) "... The stock is down 0.02% or $0.02 after the news, hitting $93.5 per share..."

e) "... About 2.31 million shares traded hands or 128.71% up from the average..."

f) "... ASML Holding NV (ADR) (NASDAQ:ASML) has declined 4.25% since April 8, 2015 and is downtrending..." (yes, the last one is NOT really new - read old posts)


a) quoting random activity, without baseline activity is not objective.
b) to buy a put option, you also need a seller. Guess what, the seller's interest is completely opposite of that of the buyer. The seller is usually a market maker, who is well aware of market positions
c) not interesting information
d) what a load of crap. 0.02% is just trading noise, not a significant reaction to a 'news'
e) there were also a lot of press releases from, a.o. ASE, TSMC, etc. Much more likely to cause the high volume of trading activity.
f) Why april and not YTD? Because that's when the downtrend started? Lol, talk about objective reporting. Btw, you're the only one who is seeing a down trend.
The semiconductor industyr downtrend has been broken as of October, when the signals of inventory adjustments coming to an end started to surface.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

MJansen schreef op 11 november 2015 14:20:

[...]

a) quoting random activity, without baseline activity is not objective.
b) to buy a put option, you also need a seller. Guess what, the seller's interest is completely opposite of that of the buyer. The seller is usually a market maker, who is well aware of market positions
c) not interesting information
d) what a load of crap. 0.02% is just trading noise, not a significant reaction to a 'news'
e) there were also a lot of press releases from, a.o. ASE, TSMC, etc. Much more likely to cause the high volume of trading activity.
f) Why april and not YTD? Because that's when the downtrend started? Lol, talk about objective reporting. Btw, you're the only one who is seeing a down trend.
The semiconductor industyr downtrend has been broken as of October, when the signals of inventory adjustments coming to an end started to surface.
You need just to be more attentive and concentrated when reading objective facts:

a) "unusual rising volume" (to 601 contracts) --> it's rising above average, i.e. "systemic info" (not random) with objective content - "number of contracts"

b) it's just a "home task-1": what do you think about the ratio sellers/buyers if prices are rising sharply ? (help: just apply standard "supply/demand" principle)

ja, "home task-2": "put contracts Nov 2015" - when could you expect an impact - soon, or later? (help: take a look at the calendar and charts)

c) "home task-3": if the 'put-price' up 48.2% --> 1) which parties dominate - "sellers" or "buyers" ? (help: take a look at point (a) above); 2) if "put-buyers" dominate (pushing prices up), what is the "spec. bet", or just a hedge - "bullish", or "bearish" (help: read just a book on derivative pricing, hedging strategies)

So, just read points once more, and if difficult, just read them again and again (it helps... sometimes)

PS. As for the point (f) - better read old posts (since last Mar), and take a look at the 1-year daily chart --> you'll see the strategic top-forming (caused by institutionals cashing) started last March, and the mt-downtrend started since May 28 - just under the main r-zone (read old posts for details)

have a nice time with trading, reading, studying..., and home tasks.

PS. Yes, as for the downtrend, it seems even a writer (of abovementioned paper) did saw it .... (read paper, or just a post again)
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SNSN schreef op 11 november 2015 15:31:

[...]

You need just to be more attentive and concentrated when reading objective facts:

a) "unusual rising volume" (to 601 contracts) --> it's rising above average, i.e. "systemic info" (not random) with objective content - "number of contracts"

b) it's just a "home task-1": what do you think about the ratio sellers/buyers if prices are rising sharply ? (help: just apply standard "supply/demand" principle)

ja, "home task-2": "put contracts Nov 2015" - when could you expect an impact - soon, or later? (help: take a look at the calendar and charts)

c) "home task-3": if the 'put-price' up 48.2% --> 1) which parties dominate - "sellers" or "buyers" ? (help: take a look at point (a) above); 2) if "put-buyers" dominate (pushing prices up), what is the "spec. bet", or just a hedge - "bullish", or "bearish" (help: read just a book on derivative pricing, hedging strategies)

So, just read points once more, and if difficult, just read them again and again (it helps... sometimes)

PS. As for the point (f) - better read old posts (since last Mar), and take a look at the 1-year daily chart --> you'll see the strategic top-forming (caused by institutionals cashing) started last March, and the mt-downtrend started since May 28 - just under the main r-zone (read old posts for details)

have a nice time with trading, reading, studying..., and home tasks.

PS. Yes, as for the downtrend, it seems even a writer (of abovementioned paper) did saw it .... (read paper, or just a post again)

a) No, that's just not true. First of all, option activity is usually much higher the closer you get to expiration date. So it's not unusual to see higher nov. option activities, as the expiration is in 2 weeks.
If it was REALLY a bet for a continued downtrend, they would have bought options that are much further down the road.
Why buy nov put options, if you could also buy mar-16 options.
The stock is in a downtrend right? so in march the stock should me much lower than in november.

b) it's rising because someone is making a bet. it's just 1 party. Just 1. It doesn't say anything. I would be much more interested in short-interest, as those are the institutionals that are placing long term bets.
Options are usually short term focused small-traders.

c) Option prices are increasing because overall volatility in the market is increasing the last few days. With a high Beta, you get a large effect on a cyclical stock like ASML.

And point z) you're way too arrogant, which is preventing you from incorporating the latest information from the market. Google 'tunnel vision syndrome'. If it is too difficult to understand, read it again and again until it clicks.

Happy trading.

And also, google 'random walk'. It might also help you to learn not to look so much at historical graphics.
They mean shat
[verwijderd]
0
Die 601 contracten put november $97,50 is speculatie of bescherming van een portefeuille. Niks meer en niks minder. De open interest van 890 putjes is peanuts.
Ik heb zomaar het idee dat onze vriend SNSN al een tijdje short zit en dat het niet zo wil vlotten met die positie...
[verwijderd]
0
En v.w.b. de open interest aangaande november ASML US: ITM 1072 calls en 1061 puts.
M.a.w. Niks, nada, noppes...
2.899 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 25 apr 2024 17:38
Koers 833,700
Verschil -1,100 (-0,13%)
Hoog 840,300
Laag 815,200
Volume 515.076
Volume gemiddeld 567.258
Volume gisteren 477.145

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront