Plug Power « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Forum Plug Power Inc geopend

3.098 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 » | Laatste
DeZwarteRidder
0
quote:

Belegopjeboterham schreef op 6 augustus 2021 10:37:


[...]Onder de streep bleef nog altijd een verlies van bijna 100 miljoen dollar over, tegenover ruim 160 miljoen dollar negatief in dezelfde periode een jaar eerder.

In het kwartaal verkocht PlugPower 3.666 brandstofcelsystemen en behaalde het omzet uit 16 hydrogene infrastructuursystemen. Dat aantal lag een jaar eerder op respectievelijk 2.683 en 4 stuks.

Plug Power rekent voor de tweede jaarhelft op een verbetering van de marges.
We weten dat ze waarschijnlijk in 2024 winst gaan maken. Maar dat er 1000 brandstofcel systemen en 12 ja ja 12 infrastructuusystemen meer verkocht zijn is toch een mooi resultaat!!.


Die vermeende winst in 2024 gaat er natuurlijk niet komen; dat wordt alleen gezegd om de aandeelhouders koest te houden.
StartendeBelegger
0
quote:

DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 10:56:


[...]

Die vermeende winst in 2024 gaat er natuurlijk niet komen; dat wordt alleen gezegd om de aandeelhouders koest te houden.


Plug zou toch bij elke verkochte brandstofcel meer verlies maken? Dit blijkt al een loze bewering. Dus dit zal ook wel niet waar zijn.
DeZwarteRidder
0
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
On August 28, 2018, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of multiple individuals against the Company and five corporate co-
defendants in the 9th Judicial District Court, Rapides Parish, Louisiana. The lawsuit relates to the previously disclosed May 2018
accident involving a forklift powered by the Company’s fuel cell at a Procter & Gamble facility in Louisiana. The lawsuit alleges
claims against the Company and co-defendants, including Structural Composites Industries, Deep South Equipment Co., Air
Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. for claims under the Louisiana Product Liability Act (“LPLA”)
including defect in construction and/or composition, design defect, inadequate warning, breach of express warranty and
negligence for wrongful death and personal injuries, among other damages. Procter & Gamble has intervened in that suit to
recover worker’s compensation benefits paid to or for the employees/dependents. Procter & Gamble has also filed suit for
property damage, business interruption, loss of revenue, expenses, and other damages. Procter & Gamble alleges theories under
the LPLA, breach of warranty and quasi-contractual claims under Louisiana law. Defendants include the Company and several of
the same co-defendants from the August 2018 lawsuit, including Structural Composites Industries, Deep South Equipment Co.,
and Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.
In March and May 2021, Company stockholders, individually and on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise
acquired Plug securities between November 9, 2020 and March 16, 2021 (the “Class”), filed complaints in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York and U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Company, Plug
Chief Executive Officer Andrew Marsh, and Plug Chief Financial Officer Paul Middleton (together, the “Defendants”), captioned
Dawn Beverly et al. v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02004 (S.D.N.Y.), Smolícek v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Case No.
2:21-cv-02402 (C.D. Cal.) and Tank v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03985 (S.D.N.Y.). The complaints include two
claims, for (1) violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b5 promulgated thereunder (against all Defendants);
and (2) violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act (against Mr. Marsh and Mr. Middleton). The complaints allege that
Defendants failed to disclose that the Company (i) “would be unable to timely file its 2020 annual report due to delays related to
the review of classification of certain costs and the recoverability of the right to use assets with certain leases”; and (ii) “was
reasonably likely to report material weaknesses
Table of Contents
57
in its internal control over financial reporting[.]” The complaints allege that, a result, “positive statements about the Company’s
business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis,” causing Class members losses
and damages. The complaints seek compensatory damages “in an amount to be proven at trial, including interest thereon”;
“reasonable costs and expenses incurred in th[e] action”; and “[s]uch other and further relief as the [c]ourt may deem just and
proper.” On July 22, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated the three cases and
appointed a lead plaintiff. On July 28, 2021, Tank v. Plug Power, et. al., was voluntarily dismissed.

DeZwarteRidder
0

On March 31, 2021, Company stockholder Junwei Liu, derivatively and on behalf of nominal defendant Plug, filed a
complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against certain Company directors and officers (the
“Derivative Defendants”), captioned Liu v. Marsh et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02753 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Liu Derivative Complaint”).
The Liu Derivative Complaint alleges that, between November 9, 2020 and March 1, 2021, the Derivative Defendants “made, or
caused the Company to make, materially false and misleading statements concerning Plug Power’s business, operations, and
prospects” by “issu[ing] positive financial information and optimistic guidance, and made assurances that the Company’s internal
controls were effective,” when, “[i]n reality, the Company’s internal controls suffered from material deficiencies that rendered
them ineffective.” The Liu Derivative Complaint asserts claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duties, (2) unjust enrichment, (3) abuse
of control, (4) gross mismanagement, (5) waste of corporate assets, and (6) contribution under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the
Exchange Act (as to the named officer defendants). The Liu Derivative Complaint seeks a judgment “[d]eclaring that Plaintiff
may maintain this action on behalf of Plug”; “[d]eclaring that the [Derivative] Defendants have breached and/or aided and
abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties”; “awarding to Plug Power the damages sustained by it as a result of the violations”
set forth in the Liu Derivative Complaint, “together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest thereon”; “[d]irecting Plug
Power and the [Derivative] Defendants to take all necessary actions to reform and improve Plug Power’s corporate governance
and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws”; and “[a]warding Plaintiff the costs and disbursements of this action,
including reasonable attorneys’ and experts’ fees, costs, and expenses”; and “[s]uch other and further relief as the [c]ourt may
deem just and proper.”

DeZwarteRidder
0
On April 5, 2021, Company stockholders Elias Levy and Camerohn X. Withers, derivatively and on behalf of nominal
defendant Plug, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Derivative
Defendants named in the Liu Derivative Complaint, captioned Levy et al. v. McNamee et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02891 (S.D.N.Y.)
(the “Levy Derivative Complaint”). The Levy Derivative Complaint alleges that, from November 9, 2020 to April 5, 2021, the
Derivative Defendants “breached their duties of loyalty and good faith” by failing to disclose “(1) that the Company would be
unable to timely file its 2020 annual report due to delays related to the review of classification of certain costs and the
recoverability of the right to use assets with certain leases; (2) that the Company was reasonably likely to report material
weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive
statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable
basis.” The Levy Derivative Complaint asserts claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duty (as to the named director defendants), (2)
unjust enrichment (as to certain named director defendants), (3) waste of corporate assets (as to the named director defendants),
and (4) violations of Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act (as to the named officer defendants). The Levy Derivative
Complaint seeks a judgment “declaring that Plaintiffs may maintain this action on behalf of the Company”; finding the
Derivative Defendants “liable for breaching their fiduciary duties owed to the Company”; directing the Derivative Defendants “to
take all necessary actions to reform and improve the Company’s corporate governance, risk management, and internal operating
procedures to comply with applicable laws”; “awarding damages to the Company for the harm the Company suffered as a result
of Defendants’ wrongful conduct”; “awarding damages to the Company for [the named officer Derivative Defendants’] violations
of Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act”; “awarding Plaintiffs the costs and disbursements of this action, including
attorneys’, accountants’, and experts’ fees”; and “awarding such other and further relief as is just and equitable.” On April 27,

2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated the Liu Derivative Complaint and the Levy
Derivative Complaint under Case No. 1:21-cv-02753-ER (the “Consolidated Action”).
On May 13, 2021, Company stockholder Romario St. Clair, derivatively and on behalf of nominal defendant Plug, filed
a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York against the Derivative Defendants named in
the Liu Derivative Complaint, captioned St. Clair v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Index No. 653167/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty.)
(the “St. Clair Derivative Complaint”). The St. Clair Derivative Complaint alleges that, for
Table of Contents
58
approximately two years beginning on March 13, 2019, the Company “failed to disclose and misrepresented the following
material, adverse facts, which the [Derivative] Defendants knew, consciously disregarded, or were reckless in not knowing,”
including: “(a) that the Company was experiencing known but undisclosed material weaknesses in its internal controls over
financial reporting; (b) the Company was overstating the carrying amount of certain right of use assets and finance obligations
associated with leases; (c) the Company was understating its loss accrual on certain service contracts; (d) the Company would
need to take impairment charges relating to certain long-lived assets; (e) the Company was improperly classifying research [and]
development costs versus costs of goods sold; and (f) the Company would be unable to file its Annual Report for the 2020 fiscal
year due to these errors.” The St. Clair Derivative Complaint asserts claims for (1) breach of fiduciary and (2) unjust
enrichment. The St. Clair Derivative Complaint seeks a judgment “for the amount of damages sustained by the Company” as a
result of the Derivative Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment; “[d]irecting Plug Power to take all
necessary actions to reform and improve its corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws”; for
“equitable and/or injunctive relief as permitted by law, equity, and state statutory provisions”; “awarding to Plug Power
restitution” and “ordering disgorgement of all profits, benefits, and other compensation obtained” by the Derivative Defendants;
“awarding to plaintiff the costs and disbursements of the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, accountants’ and experts’
fees, costs, and expenses”; and “granting such other and further relief as the [c]ourt deems just and proper.”
Item 1A – Risk Factors
The risk factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 continue to apply to our business.
Mariske
2
quote:

DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 10:56:


[...]

Die vermeende winst in 2024 gaat er natuurlijk niet komen; dat wordt alleen gezegd om de aandeelhouders koest te houden.

Open uw ogen. Er moet een wonder gebeuren als dit bedrijf in 2024 geen winst maakt.
DeZwarteRidder
0
quote:

Mariske schreef op 6 augustus 2021 13:50:


[...]
Open uw ogen. Er moet een wonder gebeuren als dit bedrijf in 2024 geen winst maakt.


Ga maar lekker slapen.....!!!
StartendeBelegger
0
quote:

StartendeBelegger schreef op 6 augustus 2021 11:50:


[...]

Plug zou toch bij elke verkochte brandstofcel meer verlies maken? Dit blijkt al een loze bewering. Dus dit zal ook wel niet waar zijn.


DZR, je hebt deze post denk gemist, maar is hier een verklaring voor?
DeZwarteRidder
0
quote:

StartendeBelegger schreef op 6 augustus 2021 14:20:


[...]DZR, je hebt deze post denk gemist, maar is hier een verklaring voor?

Vraag het maar aan Plug.
DeZwarteRidder
0
Ik verwacht miljardenclaims van de eerder genoemd procedures, dat wordt een groot feest.....!!
StartendeBelegger
3
quote:

DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 14:22:


[...]
Vraag het maar aan Plug.


Ja precies, hou dan op met onzin te verkondigen als je jezelf niet eens kan verdedigen.
Rikkerto
1
quote:

StartendeBelegger schreef op 6 augustus 2021 14:31:


[...]

Ja precies, hou dan op met onzin te verkondigen als je jezelf niet eens kan verdedigen.


Gewoon niet meer op reageren, dan stopt hij ooit vanzelf.

Mooie cijfers van plug, krijg weer beetje meer vertrouwen er in na het gedoe met uitgestelde q1 en al die bullshit.
suske wiet
0
believers en not believers.
Logica is een beetje zoek .
Verlies boeken en toch in de toekomst geloven ;
Het risico is dat als ge nu uw aandeel verkoopt en nadien spijt van gaat hebben .
Ik wil zeggen dat je twee jaar met het aandeel in wachtstand zit .
Ik heb de keuze gemaakt en blijf het gewoon behouden .
Hopen dat de leiding goede bedoelingen heeft .
De toekomst is en blijft waterstof .
Ook geen dividend .
Heb het gekocht rond de 32 dollar en hopelijk zie ik mijn geld terug ,maar zal geduld moeten hebben .
DeZwarteRidder
0
Belegopjeboterham
1
quote:

DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 19:22:


Dit aandeel gaat ongetwijfeld nog veel verder zakken, dus blijf vooral lekker zitten.
zullen we zeker blijven doen! Fijn weekend!
Katsjinggg
0
quote:

DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 19:22:


Dit aandeel gaat ongetwijfeld nog veel verder zakken, dus blijf vooral lekker zitten.



even ter duiding ....Amazon was jaaaaren niet winstgevend, en kende veel dips (zelfs tot meer dan - 80%) ....nog steeds is de het deel van de firma dat toen de core was een zorgenkindje...

MAAR ondertussen is Amazon een van de meest kostbare bedrijven ter wereld en diens oprichter bij de top 3 rijkste mensen ter wereld

of zoals Bredero zei: "het kan verkeren"
DeZwarteRidder
0
quote:

Katsjinggg schreef op 8 augustus 2021 15:54:


[...]even ter duiding ....Amazon was jaaaaren niet winstgevend, en kende veel dips (zelfs tot meer dan - 80%) ....nog steeds is de het deel van de firma dat toen de core was een zorgenkindje...
MAAR ondertussen is Amazon een van de meest kostbare bedrijven ter wereld en diens oprichter bij de top 3 rijkste mensen ter wereld
of zoals Bredero zei: "het kan verkeren"

Amazon heeft met z'n pakjes bijna nooit iets verdiend, maar bij toeval is Amazon toch nog wat waard geworden doordat ze als bijzaak cloudservice gingen verlenen.

En deze bijzaak is hoofdzaak geworden en levert nu verreweg het grootste gedeelte van de winst op.
suske wiet
0
rare beweging .
Vrijdag voor beurs opening plus 10 % slot min 0,38 dollar .
Vandaag bijna 10 omhoog .
Zijn er beter analisten rapporten gekomen ?
Belegopjeboterham
0
quote:

suske wiet schreef op 9 augustus 2021 17:55:


rare beweging .
Vrijdag voor beurs opening plus 10 % slot min 0,38 dollar .
Vandaag bijna 10 omhoog .
Zijn er beter analisten rapporten gekomen ?
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2021/08/09/plug-power-ceo-andrew-marsh-on-earnings-outlook-and-infrastructure.html
3.098 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 15 okt 2021 22:15
Koers 31,240
Verschil -0,570 (-1,79%)
Hoog 0,000
Laag 0,000
Volume 44.682
Volume gemiddeld 19.289.245
Volume gisteren 17.187.203