Energie « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Windpower - USA

740 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 33 34 35 36 37 » | Laatste
voda
0
Chinese Goldwind qualified 1GW of wind parts for full PTC

A senior executive said that Goldwind, the leading Chinese wind turbine supplier with big ambitions for the US market, qualified enough equipment in 2016 to build 1GW of future wind capacity eligible for the full production tax credit (PTC).

Goldwind, by some estimates the world’s largest wind turbine maker in 2015, has long had its eye on the US, and at one point was considering building a factory in this country, the world's second largest wind market after China.

While the factory never materialised, Goldwind's attempted US push appeared to gain traction last year after the company acquired a well-advanced 160MW wind project in Texas from RES Americas and then announced an exclusive supply deal with a local developer in Wyoming for a project that could eventually reach nearly 2GW in size.

Mr David Halligan, chief executive of Goldwind Americas, said that “We’re a supplier of turbines but we’re also very much interested in investing in late-stage, construction-ready projects.”

Mr Halligan said that the election of Donald Trump and the attendant policy uncertainties have not changed Goldwind’s general outlook or approach to the US market. Prior to the election we set about a programme of safe-harbouring equipment [for the PTC]. Post-election we did not change that programme.

He said that “We’ve set aside approximately 1GW of equipment to be installed over the next four years. We’re very much bullish on the US market.”

Mr Halligan did note, however, that the US election has forced Goldwind to “recalibrate” some of its wind-financing arrangements. And the prospect of a border-adjustment tax as part of a Republican-led overhaul of the US tax code is potentially worrisome to the Beijing-based company.

He said that “We are – and have been – active in financing a couple of projects. Pre-election we had a structure in place, and with the election we had to recalibrate.”

He added that “I’d say the banks we’ve been working with have been very co-operative in helping us through that, but obviously it creates a lot of uncertainty, and we have a very complex structure which tries to anticipate [future] changes in legislation.”

Source : Recharge News
voda
0
US grid operator SPP cracks 50pct wind for the first time

Recharge News reported that the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) has become the first of North America’s 10 grid operators to source more than half of its power from wind at a given moment, setting a continental wind-penetration record of 52.1% on the morning of 12 February.

The Little Rock, Arkansas-based SPP oversees the bulk electric grid and wholesale power market across a 14-state, 550,000-square mile (885,000 sq km) area in the central US, a region that has seen huge growth in its operating wind capacity over the past few years.

At the beginning of the century SPP had only a few hundred megawatts of wind on-line in its service area, and wind’s contribution to the electricity mix was so miniscule that it was classified as “Other” in SPP’s fuel-data statistics.

Today the region covered by SPP – stretching from the Canadian border in North Dakota down to parts of Texas – has more than 16GW of spinning wind turbines, and wind contributed 15% of the total power on its system last year, behind natural gas and coal.

Mr Bruce Rew, SPP’s vice president of operations, said that “Ten years ago we thought hitting even a 25% wind-penetration level would be extremely challenging, and any more than that would pose serious threats to reliability.”

Mr Rew said that “Now we have the ability to manage greater than 50% wind penetration, and it’s not even our ceiling. We continue to study even higher levels of renewable, variable generation as part of our plans to maintain a reliable and economic grid of the future.”

SPP’s ability to absorb and balance large amounts of variable wind power stems in part from the vastness of its geographic footprint.

SPP covers the entirety of wind-heavy states like Kansas and Oklahoma, as well as portions of other states like Texas and New Mexico. Much of Texas’ wind capacity is overseen by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), a different grid operator.

Source : Recharge News
Bijlage:
voda
0
Ontario signals extension on offshore wind project moratorium

The Canadian Press reported that six years after Ontario abruptly imposed a moratorium on offshore wind projects, citing the need for more research, the government is signalling it will likely continue for several more years, even with all of its studies in hand.

The moratorium has so far put the Liberal government on the hook for at least $28 million, and it still faces a trial next year on another $500-million lawsuit over the February 2011 decision.

Both Windstream Energy and Trillium Power Wind had wind turbine projects planned for Lake Ontario in the eastern part of the province when the government brought down the moratorium -- in Trillium's case, just minutes before its financing was set to close.

Windstream took its complaint to a NAFTA tribunal, which partially ruled in the company's favour, awarding it $25 million in damages for unfair and inequitable treatment as well as $3 million in legal fees.

Ontario's decision was "at least in part" driven by a genuine concern about a lack of scientific research, but was also influenced by public opposition to offshore wind and how it could affect the Liberals in the upcoming 2011 election, the tribunal found.

The tribunal ruled that "The government on the whole did relatively little to address the scientific uncertainty surrounding offshore wind that it had relied upon as the main publicly cited reason for the moratorium. Indeed, many of the research plans did not go forward at all, including some for lack of funding, and at the hearing counsel for the respondent confirmed that Ontario did not plan to conduct any further studies."

Five government-commissioned studies have been completed since 2011 on impacts on fish, other environmental impacts, sound and decommissioning requirements.

The studies largely found that while there were still many unknowns about offshore wind in freshwater environments, impacts were likely to be minimal. At least one concluded it was doable.

One aquatic research study said that "If appropriate precautionary measures are taken to avoid or mitigate the impacts of potential harmful or disturbing activities, and implementation strategies are adapted to reflect an ever-growing knowledge base and accommodate the best available science-based options for mitigation, offshore wind power generation within the Great Lakes has the potential to be implemented with minimal impacts on the aquatic ecosystem and in an environmentally sustainable manner."

The last two outstanding studies were made public in December, but now the government says it needs more research -- only, it hasn't commissioned any.

"Ontario will continue to follow the impact of North America's first offshore wind pilot project in Lake Erie -- a project authorized by the State of Ohio," the Ministry of the Environment said in a statement.

"Doing so will allow us to have a better grasp of any potential environmental and health challenges posed by freshwater offshore wind developments. The moratorium will not be lifted until research findings are understood and concerns surrounding offshore wind projects are addressed."

The Lake Erie project is slated to begin construction in the spring of 2018.

The Windstream contract in Ontario was signed at a time when the government was shutting down coal-fired electricity generation and looking for green sources of power. Now, the Liberal government is under fire for its green energy program, which is blamed in part for high electricity rates. It recently cancelled plans to sign contracts for up to 1,000 megawatts of power from solar, wind and other renewable energy sources.

But Windstream is still hoping their contract is honoured.

As for Trillium, its $500-million lawsuit for misfeasance in public office is set to go to trial one week after the June 7, 2018 election. Trillium doesn't buy the need for more research as an explanation for the moratorium, said its lawyer.

Morris Cooper said that "These are all really, as far as we're concerned, simply excuses for not wanting to proceed with offshore wind. (This government) has no focus other than to win the next election."

Source : The Canadian Press
voda
0
US Wind partners with JDR Cables to build Maryland Offshore Wind Project

US Wind Inc. announced a partnership with JDR Cable Systems Ltd to supply vital underwater power cables to its planned 750 MW wind project off the coast of Maryland. JDR will be US Wind’s preferred cable partner for the Maryland project, expected to be the largest offshore wind project in the Unites States to date.

Source : Strategic Research Institute
Bijlage:
voda
0
Ontario announces continuation of offshore wind turbine moratorium

Ontario announced that it would be extending its moratorium on offshore wind turbine projects. The province had initially announced the moratorium back in 2011.

The government has indicated that it requires further research before authorizing the development of off-shore wind farms. Since the moratorium was put in place, five studies have been commissioned, with the last two being publicly released in December. No further studies have been commissioned. The province appears to be waiting until the impacts of the first off-shore wind project in the Great Lakes—which has been approved by Ohio and will be located in Lake Erie—are known.

The province has faced two lawsuits as a result of the initial moratorium. US company Windstream Energy successfully sued the province under Chapter 11 of NAFTA, and a tribunal awarded the company $25 million in damages plus $3 million in legal costs. The company had planned to build a wind farm in Lake Ontario.

The tribunal found that the province had breach its duty, under article 1105 of NAFTA, to provide Windstream with fair and equitable treatment. The moratorium was based to some extent upon a lack of certainty as to the environmental impacts of off-shore wind projects. However, the NAFTA tribunal found the moratorium was also inspired by provincial concerns over the impact of the project on electricity prices and a desire to appease public opponents to such projects in light of an impending election. The province had also failed to take necessary measures within a reasonable time after the moratorium was imposed to clarify the regulatory and contractual uncertainty that Windstream was facing in the development of its project.

The province has also been sued by Trillium Power Wind, a Canadian company, in relation to an offshore wind project it had planned in Lake Ontario. The province's announcement of the moratorium occurred only minutes before financing for Trillium's project was scheduled to close. Trilliums suit alleges misfeasance in public office and seeks $500 million in damages. A related criminal investigation is also currently underway, as Trillium has alleged that government officials destroyed relevant documents upon the initiation of the lawsuit.

Source : mondaq.com
voda
0
Retiring worn-out wind turbines could cost billions that nobody has - Attorney

Valley Star reported that this is a story about death and resurrection, and as with all such stories, faith plays its part. Texas is by far the leading wind energy producer in the United States, generating more than 20,000 megawatts of electricity each year. That is about one-fourth of the nation’s wind-energy production.

We can expect the Texas winds to blow forever, but the colossal turbines which capture the breeze and transform it into electricity will not turn forever. Like all mechanical things devised by man, no matter how clever, they eventually wear out.

But the question is, what will this mean to the landscape and future of the Rio Grande Valley and, in particular, the counties of Willacy and Cameron?

And here, as we confront the end days of a wind turbine, our story begins.

Deregulating the field
When Texas deregulated its electricity market in 2002, it forced power companies, transmission providers and electricity sellers to separate. For the most part, this has worked well for the state and electricity customers, with the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, known as ERCOT, ramrodding about 75 percent of the state’s efficient power grid.

Deregulation also was a major factor in the rise of wind farms in Texas, with national and even global companies drawn to the state by its Wild West power-generation atmosphere with no regulatory agency, no permitting and no wind laws.

“It’s like prospecting: You can basically go stake your claim and build your project,” Sweetwater attorney Rod Wetsel, who co-wrote the book “Wind Law,” told MIT Technology Review last fall.

And then, of course, there are the federal subsidies which make wind energy financially possible.

Wind energy production tripled thanks to the Obama administration’s aggressive green energy agenda, going from 8,883 megawatts in 2005 to around 82,183 megawatts today, which is about 5.5 percent of the nation’s total power generation.

The congressional Joint Committee on Taxation estimates the total cost to taxpayers of the wind production tax credit between 2016 and 2020 will be $23.7 billion.

Whether those subsidies will continue under the Trump administration remains to be seen.

One big question is how much money is being set aside for the inevitable decommissioning costs associated with removing aging, unprofitable and just plain worn out wind turbines now whirling across the horizons of Cameron and Willacy counties.

Wind turbine: The life and death
The life span of a wind turbine, power companies say, is between 20 and 25 years. But in Europe, with a much longer history of wind power generation, the life of a turbine appears to be somewhat less.

“We don’t know with certainty the life spans of current turbines,” said Lisa Linowes, executive director of WindAction Group, a nonprofit which studies landowner rights and the impact of the wind energy industry. Its funding, according to its website, comes from environmentalists, energy experts and public donations and not the fossil fuel industry.

Linowes said most of the wind turbines operating within the United States have been put in place within the past 10 years. In Texas, most have become operational since 2005.

“So we’re coming in on 10 years of life and we’re seeing blades need to be replaced, cells need to be replaced, so it’s unlikely they’re going to get 20 years out of these turbines,” she said.

Estimates put the tear-down cost of a single modern wind turbine, which can rise from 250 to 500 feet above the ground, at $200,000.

With more than 50,000 wind turbines spinning in the United States, decommissioning costs are estimated at around $10 billion.

In Texas, there are approximately 12,000 turbines operational in the state. Decommissioning these turbines could cost as much as $2.3 billion.

Which means landowners and counties in Texas could be on the hook for tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars if officials determine non-functional wind turbines need to be removed.

Or if that proves to be too costly, as seems likely, some areas of the state could become post-apocalyptic wastelands steepled with teetering and fallen wind turbines, locked in a rigor mortis of obsolescence.

Recycling or resurrecting?
Companies will of course have the option of upgrading those aging wind turbines with new models, a resurrection of sorts. Yet the financial wherewithal to do so may depend on the continuation of federal wind subsidies, which is by no means assured.

Wind farm owners say the recycling value of turbines is significant and recovering valuable material like copper and steel will cover most of the cost of decommissioning.

“The problem is, wind companies have argued vehemently that the cost of money set aside should net out the salvage value of turbines,” Linowes said.

“If it costs $200,000 to take down a turbine, but once you take it down, you strip out the copper, the steel, the resellable components and sell them, then really you can make a profit,” she says of the industry’s pitch.

“So a company will say, ‘So as to cost, subtract that benefit, so rather than $200,000 for a turbine we should only set aside $60,000,’ so there’s a fight over how much money should be set aside,” she said.

In Texas, with virtually no regulatory oversight of wind farms, there is no requirement for wind companies to set aside any funds for decommissioning.

Yet extracting valuable materials from the turbines is not as easy as it sounds. For example, the copper in the wires used to transmit power from the turbine to the grid will have to be stripped of its plastic insulation, a task which would entail serious labor costs.

Also, the sheer size of the steel casings which provide the base of the turbines would take specialized cutting tools to reduce the steel to manageable or transportable chunks.

And the blades themselves are a high-tech wonder of composite material, which most experts agree cannot be separated into its component materials and is thus worthless for recycling.

“The blades are composite, those are not recyclable, those can’t be sold,” Linowes said. “The landfills are going to be filled with blades in a matter of no time.”

Faith in doing the right thing
In Cameron and Willacy counties, the operational wind farms are Cameron Wind, Los Vientos I and II, Magic Valley Wind Farm and the new San Roman Wind Farm. The turbine count for these is approximately 400 operational turbines.

voda
0
Deel 2:

At a cost of $200,000 each, decommissioning these turbines when their working life expires would cost $80 million.

At Duke Energy’s Los Vientos I and II wind farms in Willacy County, there are 191 wind turbines. Across Texas at various locations, Duke has around 900 wind turbines which are operational.

“At each of our wind sites, for example, built into the construction and operational costs is also a plan for decommissioning,” said Tammie McGee, director of corporate communications for Duke.

Duke Energy, which has been in the power business for more than 100 years, is relatively new to the wind industry. McGee said Duke began investing in wind power generation about a decade ago.

She said although Duke hasn’t been around long enough to decommission turbines, plans are in place to “repower” aging wind site locations by upgrading — resurrecting — the equipment.

“What does happen a lot of times, and is happening now around the country, is sometimes instead of decommissioning they will ‘repower’ a site,” she said.

“That involves replacing the turbines on top of the towers with new technology,” McGee added. “In the atowers, too, and put up new and more modern towers.”

If a site is properly located, the winds will still be there, making repowering an attractive financial option since the costs of site selection and development have already been covered.

Most wind farms, which pay landowners on average around $8,000 a year per turbine, have contracts with renewal clauses that stretch out to 50 or 60 years.

If Duke decides to shutter a power plant, including its wind farms, the company is committed to restoring the site to its previous state, she said.

“Regardless of fuel type, whether its gas or coal or wind or solar, once a power plant is no longer in service we restore the land to how it was before we got there,” McGee said.

Calls seeking comment from two other wind energy companies operating in Cameron County, Apex Clean Energy which operates Cameron Wind and Acciona United States, which runs the San Roman Wind Farm near Laguna Vista, were not returned.

Unlike Duke Energy, some of the smaller wind farm companies operating in Texas, with fewer financial resources, may be tempted to just walk away when aging turbines no longer spin a profit.

Linowes believes such moves may begin occurring even before wind turbines outlive their useful life as manufacturing warranties on the big turbines expire.

“At what point does the cost of maintenance tip over to the point it’s not worth maintaining a turbine?” she said. “We’re in something of an unknown or uncertain territory.”

As wind turbine manufacturing has improved, the length of warranties on these products has decreased dramatically and today the terms of most cover between five and 10 years.

It seems paradoxical that warranties would become shorter as products become better, but many wind turbine manufacturers have found a valuable revenue stream in selling extended warranties, similar to companies which sell appliances to consumers.

Linowes added that “It could be a very ugly situation in the next five years when we see turbines need work, and are no longer under warranty and not generating enough electricity to keep running them.”

Source : Valley Star
Bijlage:
voda
0
GE Renewable Energy to equip first commercial US integrated solar-wind hybrid project

GE Renewable Energy announced that it has been selected to supply equipment for the first commercial integrated solar-wind hybrid power generation project in the industry. The 4.6MW community based project in Red Lake Falls, Minnesota, developed by Juhl Energy, will use two 2.3-116 wind turbines from GE Renewable Energy’s Onshore Wind business supported by 1MW of solar power conversion equipment provided by GE’s Current business. The project is expected to enter commercial operation in August, 2017.

Source : Strategic Research Institute
voda
0
Governor M Cuomo approves nation's largest offshore wind farm in New York

Gov. Andrew M Cuomo announced the board of trustees of the Long Island Power Authority voted to approve the nation's largest offshore wind farm, and the first offshore wind farm in New York. The approval of the South Fork Wind Farm, a 90 megawatt development 30 mi. (48.3 km) southeast of Montauk, is the first step toward developing an area that can host up to 1,000 megawatts of offshore wind power. The wind farm, which is out of sight from Long Island's beaches, will provide enough electricity to power 50,000 Long Island homes with clean, renewable energy, and will help meet increasing electricity demand on the South Fork of Long Island.

Source : Strategic Research Institute
Bijlage:
voda
0
California senator proposes 100pct renewable energy goal

nawindpower.com reported that a bill that seeks to accelerate the state’s renewable portfolio standard (RPS) by five years, as well as establish an ultimate target of 100% renewables, has been proposed in California.

S.B.584 was introduced on Feb. 17 by State Sen. Kevin De Leon, D-District 24, who also serves as Senate president pro tempore.

California currently has an RPS of 50% by 2030. Under the senator’s newly proposed bill, the renewables mandate would be sped up to 50% by 2025 and 100% by 2045.

Notably, if passed, the bill would put California on par with Hawaii, the only other U.S. state with a 100% RPS.

On the same day he proposed the new bill, De Leon released a statement on Scott Pruitt’s confirmation as head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Specifically, he noted what clean energy is bringing to California.

He said that “We’ve proven that you can protect the environment and grow jobs. We’ve delinked economic growth from greenhouse-gas emissions and helped turn clean energy into a pillar of our economy that now supports over half a million jobs in our state.”

Source : nawindpower.com
Bijlage:
voda
0
North Dakota proposes wind energy moratorium for two years

Associated Press reported that worried North Dakota's burgeoning wind energy industry may be threatening the state's coal-fired power plants, a Republican lawmaker has proposed legislation that would halt wind-generation projects for two years.

Mandan Sen. Dwight Cook said the state's wind power industry enjoys more favorable tax incentives and less onerous regulations than coal factories, putting them at an unfair advantage. He also said the intent of his proposal is to ensure a reliable source of electricity

Cook said that "Coal plants are shutting down and my assumption is wind generation has something to do with it."

North Dakota has seven coal-fueled electric power factories. One, owned by Minnesota's Great River Energy, is slated to shutter this year. The company blamed the shutdown on low prices in the regional energy market.

Almost 70 percent of electricity produced from North Dakota's power plants is exported to surrounding states to more than 2 million customers. Meanwhile, wind energy — which is cleaner but less reliable than coal-fueled electricity — has become more prevalent in North Dakota in the past decade.

The state ranked 11th in the nation last year for the number of turbines and installed wind capacity, according to the American Wind Energy Association. The Washington-based group also has rated North Dakota as having the nation's greatest wind energy potential.

North Dakota has about 2,850 megawatts of power generated from wind turbines, and another 6,000 megawatts planned or under construction. A megawatt is roughly enough electricity to power 1,000 homes.

Cook introduced his measure to impose a moratorium on wind energy development through the use of a so-called hog-house amendment that erases an existing bill and rewrites it. By doing so, the public can't comment on the proposal because hearings already have been held on the original measure.

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, on which Cook serves, approved the measure 4-3 last week. The full Senate is expected to debate the bill on Wednesday.

Florida-based NextEra Energy Resources, which accounts for about half of North Dakota's wind-generated power, called the legislation "extremely shortsighted." The organization said the bill "ignores the fact that wind development in North Dakota is a significant source of tax revenue and job creation, not to mention a source of income for private landowners."

Source : Associated Press
Bijlage:
voda
0
MGE plans USD 107 million wind farm in northeast Iowa

Wisconsin State Journal reported that Madison Gas & Electric plans to build a wind farm in northeast Iowa that could generate up to 66 megawatts of electricity, enough to power about 47,000 homes.

The Madison utility company said that the Saratoga wind farm in Howard County, Iowa will consist of 33 turbines, each nearly 500 feet tall. That's 100 feet higher than turbines at MGE's Top of Iowa wind farm in Worth County, in north-central Iowa, installed in 2008.

If regulators approve the proposal, it will be built next year and will begin operating by the end of 2018. The estimated cost: $107 million.

Mr Gary Wolter, MGE chairman, president and CEO, said that "This is an exciting opportunity for our customers and continues the progress we've made in reducing carbon emissions and increasing renewable energy. With recent advances in technology, this project represents a long-term, cost-effective strategy for MGE to continue to transition to cleaner energy sources."

The announcement came one week before Wolter is slated to retire as president and CEO, to be succeeded by Jeffrey Keebler, senior vice president of energy supply and planning, on March 1. Wolter will remain chairman of the boards of MGE and parent firm MGE Energy.

Tyler Huebner, executive director of the Madison renewable energy advocacy nonprofit RENEW Wisconsin, praised MGE's Saratoga project. "We're happy to see MGE move ahead on their Energy 2030 framework and identify a large, renewable energy project," he said.

Huebner was not surprised about the Iowa location.

He said that "Right now, southwest Wisconsin is a little transmission-constrained. That is hurting the ability to develop wind power (in Wisconsin)."

Spokeswoman Elizabeth Katt Reinders, in Madison, said that the Sierra Club also is glad to see MGE "taking the much needed initiative to invest in wind power. We'd like to see MGE commit to large-scale clean energy investment with the goal of replacing, not augmenting, dirty fossil fuels."

In its Energy 2030 plan, released in November 2015, MGE said it plans to supply 25 percent of its electric sales from renewable resources by 2025 and 30 percent by 2030.

MGE said it started searching for sites for a wind farm in summer 2015. It began negotiations for the northeast Iowa site in summer 2016 and obtained rights to the location last year from initial site developer RPM Access.

Source : Wisconsin State Journal
Bijlage:
voda
0
Brazil’s BNDES clears USD 274million loan for Rio Energy wind project

Brazil’s National Development Bank (BNDES) approved a R$847.9m ($274m) loan to Rio Energy – the Brazilian renewables arm of US investment fund Denham Capital – for the construction of the 223MW Serra da Babilônia wind complex.

Through Rio Energy, Denham Capital has been investing in Brazil’s wind power market since the start of the Brazilian wind boom in 2009. It has 484MW in wind projects with power-purchase agreements, including Serra da Babilônia, and a renewables development pipeline of 2.1GW including wind and solar.

Located in the North-eastern state of Bahia, Serra da Babilônia comprises eight wind projects contracted in the reserve tender of 2015, with 20-year PPAs that are scheduled to start in January 2018. Total investment in the projects is estimated at R$1.5bn, according to the BNDES.

The bank said that the Serra da Babilônia complex will be built with 95 wind turbines rated at 2.35MW each.

Source : rechargenews.com
voda
0
Issuance of request for qualification for 200 MW of wind energy in Saskatchewan

Last week, SaskPower, the provincial electricity production corporation for Saskatchewan, initiated a procurement process for 200 MW of wind energy for a fixed term of 25 years. The request for qualifications phase has begun and will be followed by a request for proposals later this year.

Saskatchewan has set a target to reduce 40 % of its greenhouse gas emissions below 2005 levels and to ensure that half of all electricity generated in the province originates from renewable sources by 2030. SaskPower seeks to procure new sources of energy through a competitive bidding process, as was the case for the block of 10 MW of solar energy launched in September 2016, the winning project for which should soon be announced.

The current request for qualifications for wind energy projects will close on May 2, 2017. This step will be followed in mid-May 2017 by a request for proposals in which only projects from a maximum of 8 qualified proponents will be considered for a 25-year power purchase agreement. The winning projects are anticipated to be selected by the end of the year and the expected in-service dates for such projects should be no later than April 30, 2020. Up to 2 submissions per proponent will be allowed.

At the qualification stage, a proponent’s eligibility is subject to minimum thresholds regarding its level of experience with utility-scale wind projects, financial capacity and equity. At the proposals stage, past and contemplated community engagement, First Nations participation and the proposed site, price and availability of interconnection of each project will be evaluated. A project compliance with the Wildlife Siting Guidelines for Saskatchewan Wing Energy Projects, issued on September 19, 2016 by the Ministry of Environment and Community Sustainability, will also be taken into consideration for the proposed site.

Meanwhile, SaskPower will hold a conference call on February 28, 2017 to provide information on its expectations and intentions for the current wind energy procurement.

Source : Canadian Energy Law Blog
voda
0
German firm sets up for share of NS wind energy market

The Chronicle Herald reported that a German company is setting up a Canadian subsidiary with an office in Halifax to snag a share of the Canadian wind energy market.

Mr Jakobus Smit, a member of the IFE Eriksen AG’s management board, in an interview, said that “Renewable energy will play an increasingly important role in the energy mix of all Canadian provinces. For that reason we have participated in ongoing solicitation procedures for projects in New Brunswick under the (regulations for community renewable energy projects).”

That New Brunswick LORESS (Locally-owned Renewable Energy projects that are Small Scale) program for community renewable energy projects is similar to Nova Scotia’s community feed-in tariff program, commonly called COMFIT. It allowed community-owned, small-scale renewable energy projects in this province to sell electricity to Nova Scotia Power.

New Brunswick’s program, launched last year, initially encouraged the creation of community-based renewable energy projects with ties to aboriginal groups, and received about 22 proposals for projects by its deadline last month. Those submissions are now being reviewed.

In that phase of the program, New Brunswick was hoping to generate 40 megawatts of electricity from renewable sources like hydro, biomass, wind and solar energy.

Ms Marie Andrée Bolduc, an NB Power spokeswoman, said that the second phase of the New Brunswick program was launched about two weeks ago and allows municipalities, co-operatives and not-for-profit organizations in that province to generate electricity.

Gaëtan Thomas, NB Power’s chief executive officer and president, said that “These small-scale renewable projects will allow for these organizations to develop, implement and manage their own energy projects in their communities while helping NB Power meet its energy demand.”

The deadline for proposals for that second phase is April 28. It allows for the production of up to 20 megawatts by a local entity, or up to the maximum of 40 megawatts for a project owned by two local entities.

With the demand for renewable energy ramping up, IFE Eriksen is seeing an opportunity in Atlantic Canada.

Mr Smit said that “We believe that, due to the constantly-increasing cost competitiveness of renewable energy, other provinces in Atlantic Canada offer perspectives for project developments in the medium- and long-term.”

In Germany, privately-held IFE Eriksen employs a total of about 50 people at its head office in Oldenburg and its regional office in Brandenburg.

Its new, wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, IFE Project Management Canada Inc., will employ five people and the company is already advertising in the Chronicle Herald for a project manager, commercial manager, legal manager and team assistant for onshore projects.

Gerhard Bookjans, another member of the company’s management board, said in an interview said that “We intend to establish a team of 4-5 people to develop and manage our activities in Canada.”

The IFE Eriksen execs would not divulge the company’s annual revenues. They also said the opening of the Halifax office is not tied to a specific wind energy project.

Source : The Chronicle Herald
Bijlage:
voda
0
GE Renewable to supply equipment for solar-wind hybrid project in US

Energy Business Review reported that GE Renewable Energy has been selected to supply equipment for the new 4.6MW integrated solar-wind hybrid power generation project in Minnesota, US. Located in Red Lake Falls, Minnesota, the integrated solar-wind hybrid being developed by Juhl Energy will feature two 2.3-116 wind turbines from GE Renewable Energy’s Onshore Wind business.

The facility, which is scheduled to be commissioned in August 2017, will also feature a 1MW of solar power conversion equipment, which will be provided by GE’s Current business.

Said to be the first integrated solar-wind plant operating commercially in the US, the project will use GE’s wind integrated solar energy technology platform, which will integrate the solar panels through the wind turbine’s converter directly.

GE said that the design will not only allow both wind and solar share all the same balance of plant but increase the net capacity by 3-4% and annual energy production by up to 10.

Mr Pete McCabe, GE Renewable Energy onshore wind president and CEO said that “By leveraging the complementary nature of wind and solar, this unique project shows how GE is driving technology innovation that will help customers deliver more renewable energy in an even more efficient manner.”

GE said that the project’s hybrid design allows for power generation at peak time, as the solar provides summer peak energy and the wind provides winter peak energy. It will also allow the project to produce power when it is most needed.

Mr Dan Juhl, Juhl Energy CEO said that “Juhl Energy’s package design, with the GE hybrid technology, can economically blend clean, renewable energy into the grid at lower cost, plus add reliability to the system.”

According to Global Market Insights’ report, the market for hybrid solar wind projects is estimated to reach $1.47bn by 2024.

Source : Energy Business Review
voda
0
Stanford researchers create cutting-edge lab model of HAWT

azocleantech.com reported that many people are familiar with the sight of propeller-like rotating blades placed high up the pole of a high horizontal-axis wind turbine (HAWT). HAWTs are often grouped in wind farms and they provide large amounts of energy for local communities.

However, HAWTs have a drawback, that is, they take large space and they need to be placed far apart from each other. If placed very close to each other, the wind velocity deficit and turbulence intensity caused by one HAWT can affect the output power of a neighboring HAWT.

In order to tackle this, scientists are exploring vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs), which could be arranged in groups or spread out within HAWT arrays. A VAWT has a cylindrical shape, with the blades aligned parallel to each other and rotating around the pole on which the rotor is placed.

These "egg-beater" VAWTs are much smaller compared to the "propeller" HAWTs, approximately 10 times shorter in height, and output only approximately 0.1% as much power per turbine.

Anna Craig, a mechanical engineering doctoral candidate at Stanford University, and her collaborators recently examined modeling VAWT array arrangements. They report their findings this week in AIP Publishing’s Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy.
Although an individual VAWT does not produce as much energy as a single HAWT, the wind flow synergies produced in a closely-spaced array of VAWTs can possibly produce up to 10 times more power per unit of land area compared to an array of widely-spaced HAWTs.

According to Craig, scientists agree that before deploying VAWTs at an energy sector scale, more research needs to be performed. However, Craig and her collaborators provided important insights into one crucial VAWT challenge: how to study, test and develop ideas for effective array arrangements.

They performed this experiment in a lab because it is very expensive to conduct field testing, and at the same time, computer simulations are not refined enough or they are very computationally expensive.

According to Craig and her collaborators, this lab experiment and similar studies provide significant possibilities for in-field arrangements and refining numerical simulations. The scientists performed their experiment in the large water flume at the Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory situated in the department of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford, where the water flow of the system effectively represented the wind flow.

Craig arranged approximately 1,300 1-inch gears between plates that were reconfigurable during the experiment. The scientists mounted approximately 300 rotating cylinders on top of these gears in order to create a 10-foot-long array, with the rotating cylinders effectively representing VAWTs. They tested 10 different arrays with different configurations.

The experiment shed light on the VAWTs' time-space averaged vertical flow, which is important for turbine arrangements.

"What I saw is this net vertical flow from above the array, down into the array and out the sides of the array, which was somewhat unexpected." Craig said. "These net vertical and transverse flows eliminate horizontal homogeneity within the array and introduce a new mechanism by which the energy resource within an array can be replenished."

Craig said that this experiment provides significant insights for future studies for numerical and in-field testing.

Craig is very positive about the VAWT technology and its potential uses, and she notes that in the future it could be spread out within HAWT arrays and could be brought to places that are not easily amenable to large HAWTs, such as cities and islands. She also said that VAWTs could potentially have lesser impact on environment compared to HAWTs.

"We should consider numerical or even field experiments with larger numbers of VAWTs because the laboratory experiments have shown that the physical mechanisms are there for these larger arrays of turbines to work," Craig said.

Source : azocleantech.com
Bijlage:
voda
0
Mr Trump may ground flying wind turbines that soared under Obama - Report
Published on Fri, 03 Mar 2017

Saul Griffith first tested a flying wing that could send wind turbines high into the atmosphere from the roof of the MIT Media Lab. At an altitude of 1,000 feet, the wind blasts consistently, making the power source cheaper and more reliable.

But in 2009, after eight years of tinkering, his company Makani Power and its flying wind generators were in trouble. With the recession at its peak, Griffith hit a point familiar to other energy inventors: his ability to make money from his technology was still years away but he couldn’t find new private capital to keep the enterprise afloat.

Into this so-called Valley of Death stepped the federal government with emergency supplies. Makani got a $4 million grant from the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, a program created with bipartisan support under President George W. Bush and first funded under Barack Obama. A few years later he sold Makani to Google Inc.

Griffith said that "ARPA-E is the only reason the project continued to exist. If ARPA-E goes away, high-risk energy research will die in this country."

ARPA-E, which is held its annual conference near Washington this week, has doled out about $1.5 billion to 580 different projects since its first funding in the 2009 stimulus. Modeled after the military’s research arm that’s credited with inventing the internet and GPS, ARPA-E’s stated goal is to help inventors translate science into breakthrough technologies. Many of the ideas sound fantastical: a personal air conditioner that follows you around or a squid-skin inspired shirt to regulate body temperature. None are sure bets, and the program has had its share of failures. A carbon capture technique using enzymes was cancelled.

Now the program itself is at risk of cancellation.

President Donald Trump pledged this week to slash spending across the government, and programs like ARPA-E, which is administered by the Department of Energy, face deep cuts or possible elimination. And, with the antipathy among Trump’s team for the efforts to address climate change under Obama, programs like ARPA-E are near the top of the budget hit list.

Jack Spencer, a vice president of Heritage and a former member of Trump’s Energy department transition team, said that "It’s unclear to me what purpose ARPA-E actually plays. The Valley of Death is where bad ideas go to die."

Even before Trump’s inauguration, his Energy department landing team requested “a complete list of ARPA-E’s projects,” according to a leaked memo. Former congressman Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s budget chief, authored an amendment in 2012 that would have slashed its funding. Budget blue prints issued by both the Republican Study Committee, a group of fiscally conservative lawmakers, and the Heritage Foundation called for killing it off.

Heritage cited a watchdog report that found the agency awarded several grants to companies that had already gotten private financing. Congress should instead make the Energy department focus on doing the basic research and let the private sector figure out how to commercialize it, the group argues.

Eric Rohlfing, ARPA-E’s acting director said in an interview that "We haven’t seen any budget yet so there is nothing for me to comment on there. A transition is a complicated process and so what we have been doing is talking with the transition team explaining who we are, what we do, how we do it, and why it’s impactful and successful."

Like many of the programs in the sights of the administration, killing it outright may be easier proposed than accomplished. ARPA-E has its proponents, and they’re not just among those tinkering in Northern California garages or marching against oil pipelines.

Among its supporters on Capitol Hill are Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski, chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Lamar Alexander, chairman of the energy panel of the Appropriations Committee. Rick Perry, Trump’s pick to head the Energy department, pledged to be "engaged in" ARPA-E, but indicated it may face some budget cuts. He vowed to work with Congress to ensure "an appropriate funding level."

Rich Powell, managing director of policy and strategy for ClearPath Action, a group founded to encourage Republicans to support clean energy, said that "This is not one that I’m terribly worried about. Once Trump’s "team engages deeply with these programs they’re going to realize that this is not a place to cut deeply."

Business heavyweights such as Bill Gates, the Microsoft Corp. founder and Tom Fanning, president of Southern Co., have banded together as part of the American Energy Innovation Council to argue ARPA-E financing should increase to $1 billion a year, about triple its current level. Unlike the Energy department’s loan program, which had the high-profile failure after solar developer Solyndra went bankrupt, ARPA-E provides smaller grants to projects at an earlier stage of development and so the individual risks are lower.

Source : Bloomberg
Bijlage:
voda
0
Minnesota looks to double renewable energy standard to 50pct by 2030

Power Magazine reported that Bipartisan lawmakers in Minnesota want utilities in that state to procure 50% of power sold by 2030 from renewable sources. The measure, if passed, could put the state’s renewable efforts on par with California’s.

The bipartisan bill introduced in the Minnesota Legislature on February 27 seeks to double the state’s renewable energy standard, which is currently 25% by 2025.

Lawmakers noted that the state is already on track to surpass current goals set by the Next Generation Energy Act, which was enacted by former Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R) in 2007. That bill was overwhelmingly supported by 97% of legislators.

About 21% of Minnesota’s generated electricity came from renewable sources in 2015, according to the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Wind energy generated 17% of the state’s power, biomass generated 3%, and hydro 1%. About 44% came from coal, 21% from nuclear, and 13% from natural gas.

Under a 2007 statute, Xcel Energy—the state’s largest utility—has a separate, more aggressive requirement of getting 31.5% of its power from renewables by 2020, with at least 24% of sales from wind and 1.5% of sales from solar. In 2015, about 23% of Xcel’s electricity supply came from wind, hydro, solar, and biomass. By 2020, the power company anticipates 31% of its power mix will be generated from renewables.

Lt. Governor Tina Smith in a statement, said that “If we redouble our efforts, and raise Minnesota’s Renewable Energy Standard to 50 percent by 2030, we will improve air quality, continue to drive down the cost of renewable energy, and generate thousands of new energy jobs.”

She said that the renewable standard has fueled economic growth in Minnesota. Clean energy jobs in the state grew 78% between 2000 and 2014. Raising the standard would create more jobs and be especially beneficial for the state’s environment and natural resources.

She added that “The state’s moose herd has declined by 50 percent. Minnesota’s spruce, fir, aspen, and birch forests have retreated toward Canada, as changing temperatures make our state an inadequate climate. Raising Minnesota’s Renewable Energy Standard is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and restoring our state’s pristine natural resources.”

Twenty-nine U.S. states and the District of Columbia now have renewable portfolio standards that require utilities to sell a specified percentage or amount of renewable power. California’s Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in October 2015 signed into law a bill that expands its historic 33% by 2020 renewable portfolio standard to require utilities to procure 50% of their power from renewables by 2030.

Source : Power Magazine
voda
0
EIS approved for Coopers Gap wind farm

The Environmental Impact Statement for the Coopers Gap wind-farm has been approved by the Coordinator-General today. Minster for State Development, Natural Resources and Mines Anthony Lynham announced the approval in Parliament today.

Dr Lynham said that "When completed this will be Queensland's biggest wind farm and contribute up to $4 million each year to the local economy - a big win for the Wide Bay Burnett and Darling Downs regions. Most importantly, the project's proponent AGL Energy Limited has advised they will employ local people and local contractors wherever possible.”

He said that depending on the timing of the project approvals, construction could start later this year, creating 350 construction jobs and 20 permanent jobs once operation starts in 2020.

He added that "The Coordinator-General has placed conditions on his approval, including on noise, shadow flicker, electromagnetic interference and impacts on flora and fauna.”

The wind farm could generate up to 460 megawatts of electricity and potentially supply power to more than 240,000 households.

He further added that "As an energy project of the future, it is estimated that around 1 million tonnes per year of greenhouse gas emissions would be avoided through supply of the wind farm's green power to the grid. That's the equivalent of taking about 320,000 petrol-driven cars off the road each year.”

Source : South Burnett Times
740 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 33 34 35 36 37 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Markt vandaag

 AEX
882,63  +12,36  +1,42%  18:05
 Germany40^ 18.181,80 +1,48%
 BEL 20 3.874,87 +0,44%
 Europe50^ 5.012,78 +1,49%
 US30^ 38.265,08 +0,37%
 Nasd100^ 17.731,32 +1,74%
 US500^ 5.104,03 +1,17%
 Japan225^ 38.248,05 +1,39%
 Gold spot 2.333,67 +0,07%
 EUR/USD 1,0694 -0,33%
 WTI 83,91 +0,19%
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer

Stijgers

EBUSCO HOLDING +9,33%
NX FILTRATION +8,77%
ASMI +7,26%
Alfen N.V. +5,89%
PostNL +3,82%

Dalers

SIGNIFY NV -11,28%
Wereldhave -7,62%
AMG Critical ... -5,77%
IMCD -4,90%
ABN AMRO BANK... -4,19%

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront